Author: DvlsAdvc8 | Posted on: 1/13/2009 9:09:34 AM | Views : 313

Ok, I'm in a bit of a pickle.  Backstory: I'm only vaguely familiar with ASP.NET (C#) - I'm primarily a Java guy.  Anyhow, my company got a project to redevelop a web app and as always we're short handed.  The customer has a database and compiled code, but no source.  They have plenty of complaints so we're going to redevelop the app.  The database looks good to me - and after a couple months worth of requirements analysis, there are only a couple minor things I'd change.

My problem is with .Net's membership provider.  Am I missing something or does the model not provide for permissions?  It looks like it ends with roles.  My customer requires the ability to create new roles as needed.  I was thinking to have permanent permissions defined and associated with roles for user management convenience, but the apps features are to be controlled by whether the user has a given permission or ...

Go to the complete details ...